Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow Co-Grow

Browse by Tag

The Collaborative Growth Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Is It Time to Establish 'The Inbound Marketing Agency Oath'?

 

At HubSpot, more than 900 agencies have decided to invest in learning inbound marketing the way that HubSpot teaches it. I would hazard to guess that there are several hundred more agencies who have decided to launch 'inbound marketing services' without partnering with HubSpot too. Some of our new partners launch inbound marketing services with more vigor than others. Some add it to their current offerings. Some take a right turn and begin exclusively offering inbound marketing services to clients. Some try to meld inbound with outbound.  Some take 12 months to learn before they start offering inbound services. No matter what they do, many agencies are offering inbound marketing services these days. 

Yesterday, I was copied on an email that said, "We have changed our minds and have decided to expand into offering inbound marketing services. We plan to add search engine optimization (SEO), search engine marketing (SEM) and social media management services (SMM) to our offerings. Can we resume our conversation?" First, I looked at their website, assuming they were already offering lead generation and marketing automation services. They weren't. A bit frustrated, I was very tempted to write back and say, "THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF INBOUND MARKETING. SEO, SEM and SMM is 1/4th of the process. You must then help your clients turn that traffic into leads, turn those leads into sales and use analytics to help them continuously improve results." Luckily, one of team members responded first with, "When would you like to schedule a call?" Argument averted.

The other day, when I announced that I am launching an inbound networking group for marketing agencies, John McTigue left a comment that got me thinking: (Minor edits.)

"I would actually be even more interested in getting together some of the best minds in the business to create a special consortium, like the W3C, to help drive best practices in digital marketing. [The group would] provide thought leadership. With HubSpot's backing in spirit, this could become a go-to resource for anyone interested in doing things the right way. By becoming a member and participating, each network agency would have the opportunity to raise their profile. The goal would be greater awareness of best practices from an independent body."

Years ago, when HubSpot launched the Inbound Marketing University and the inbound movement began in earnest, I had suggested we develop an inbound oath. We never did that. Today it feels like the inbound marketing agency migration is in full swing, and more and more agencies have adopted the moniker, 'inbound marketing agency'. The time to create an oath  feels like it is now. There are way too many agencies saying that they are inbound agencies without really understanding how to produce a measurable, predictable and improvable ROI for their clients. There's lots of agencies giving it a bad name. They are..

  • selling 'inbound marketing' projects or short term 'inbound' engagements,
  • espousing content creation without knowing how to use it for lead generation and nurturing,
  • letting clients pick and choose services instead of making the right tactical recommendations at the right frequency in the right sequence,
  • selling it evangelically instead of based on client goals,
  • not involving clients in their service delivery processes,
  • making it seem like a mystery instead of transparently reporting results...
  • and many many more bad agency habits. 

There are even many agencies that are making it up as they go along, just like agencies usually do. So, before the term gets watered down and means nothing, the ones that "do things the right way" should probably help to establish best practice.

What do you guys think? Should we create this oath? What should be on it? 

Comments

First thoughts and reaction: Who is the oath for? The agency, or the client? W3C, WAA aren't backed by one company, that's what gives them credibility in the industry. 
 
Is there a need to separate the wheat from the chaf? Is it buyer beware? Hell yes. Will an oath accomplish or change that? Not sure. it's a nice thought, but what are the teeth? 
 
Or is this where the inbound agency networking group is going?  
Posted @ Friday, July 13, 2012 10:07 PM by Carole Mahoney
I think this blog post sums it up perfectly. I know that over the past several months as our company starts to work with more and more clients with their inbound marketing I have heard of many others that have made promises of quick fixes, short term successes and taken an overall approach that lacks both marketing strategy and smart planning. 
 
I like the idea of a consortium of sorts but I would like to hear more about what it would do and how it would be supported.  
 
I also really like the idea of an oath or a pledge. Although the enforcement of it would be self regulated I would think. I know that our company – The Center for Sales Strategy ( a sales performance company that has been a leader for the past 28 years in providing media companies and B2B sales operations with sales and sales management consulting) started using inbound to grow our business a while back and have found it to be quite successful. One of the things we did was create a pledge that we adhere to. Now we have started working with clients to develop their inbound marketing initiatives…(this is a natural for us as all sales dept. have the need for quality leads and inbound when done right is exactly that) and as part of us working with them we help them to create a pledge or oath. But the pledge and oath I write about here is more focused on how we will use inbound marketing and not how we will act and define ourselves as an inbound marketing agency. Our pledge that I just referenced is one we share openly with all our clients and prospects as we truly believe that if followed it will really help to achieve success. I share it here only as an idea starter for how we might create the pledge or oath for how we act as consultants and agencies. Our pledge: We pledge to be more educational than promotional. Commit to the idea that not everything has to generate a lead. Not everything needs to include a download. Not everything has to come with a price. In order to establish ourselves as thought leaders we have to commit to teach, to share, to be honest and to publish all the time. Authenticity is key. 
 
So now I am off to create and think about what our pledge should be as an inbound marketing agency… I have some ideas but I look forward to reading others thoughts. Thanks for starting this conversation.
Posted @ Friday, July 13, 2012 11:26 PM by Matt Sunshine
In the 90's, having been in on the ground floor of another industry (called "coaching") and heavily involved in creating certifications and standards, I can see where an oath (or certification) might add value for a buyer of inbound marketing services. I can also see where it could create a complicated layer of politics (inevitable) that detracts so much from the good intentions as to be virtually useless.  
 
As @Carole pointed out, unless there is an enforcement of the oath by a well-respected and objective "industry" association (is there such a group anywhere?), it's hard to see whether it would ever be meaningful. Even W3C has its loud detractors and is mired in politics (takes forever for new standards to get passed), ditto for IEEE, ISO and a gazillion other standards groups.  
 
I myself am more interested in being part of a "think tank" that explores new possibilities for inbound marketing (technologies, processes) to keep it evolving and innovating. Creating a group that sets standards is fine, but feels more like trying to tame the savage beast. To my mind, it's the savage beast running wild that keeps innovation alive. So, rebel that I am, I'm more interested in finding ways to change the game to keep inbound marketing as effective as possible. 
 
If I had to choose today about taking an oath for inbound marketing agencies, I'd say no. Instead, I'd put my money on relying on buyers voting with their online networks and their money.  
 
In my mind, the accountability that comes from a vocal and empowered public that can spread the word to millions faster than I can type is far more useful to me as a buyer than any oath (or certifications). There are lots of agencies who can't and don't walk the talk today, and probably won't tomorrow. But ultimately they'll fall by the wayside and get the clients they deserve. (And I sure wouldn't want those clients, would you?) 
 
I empathize with the desire to protect the baby called "inbound marketing." Instead of focusing on erecting "childproof" barriers around it, I'd focus on making the baby healthier and smarter. I don't know that an oath would accomplish that. But I'm open to be convinced otherwise...
Posted @ Friday, July 13, 2012 11:32 PM by Mary Planding
Pete, I agree that a set of standards or best practices that agencies agree upon and adhere to would be good for the industry and for its clients. Whether or not there's an "oath" involved is debatable, but I could certainly support developing a set of Standards of Work for the consortium based on known best practices that deliver results. It wouldn't have to be numbers of blogs or other deliverables, but more based on processes and workflows that work and an agreement to pursue those goals that you mentioned, i.e. not doing those "bad practices". As far as enforcement goes, I suppose the Consortium could police itself and "kick out" any obvious violators. The main benefit would be raising awareness of best practices within the group and giving the client base a "Seal of Approval" that they could count on in hiring an agency.
Posted @ Saturday, July 14, 2012 7:01 AM by John McTigue
I'd like to change my earlier comment. to sign an oath to do what is in the best interest of your client, which is something you should be doing anyway , seems counter productive to the whole concept of Inbound networking.  
 
I'm with Mary, encourage a think tank of best ideas and practices owned by everyone. You want me to sign an oath to do what I'm doing anyway? Waste of my time. You want to make inbound continuously better? Different story.
Posted @ Saturday, July 14, 2012 7:06 PM by Carole Mahoney
Oaths are bogus. Actions that support values and integrity are what matters.
Posted @ Saturday, July 14, 2012 11:29 PM by Ryan Malone
Thanks to all involved for advancing this important discussion. I think the discussion around standards and/or certification is really valuable because it gives us the opportunity to provide greater assurance to potential buyers that the provider they're working with is a qualified practitioner. There's a growing din of loosely qualified self-proclaimed gurus potentially damaging the credibility of true industry leaders, pioneers, and experts. Certification rewards those willing to invest in genuinely developing the experience and approaches to lead to the results clients expect and need.
Posted @ Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:23 PM by Greg Linnemanstons
@Ryan- I wish there was a like button for Hubspot blog comments. Just for you, I'm submitting it to Hubspot ideas.
Posted @ Sunday, July 15, 2012 9:08 PM by Carole Mahoney
@Carol - Thanks. Seemed like common sense.
Posted @ Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:50 PM by Ryan Malone
Another great post, Pete. Somewhat along the lines of John's comments, one model might be to establish an independent credentialing authority (funded by applications, membership, etc.) to certify inbound marketing professionals (an extension or evolution of IMU) AND certify agencies. Brings to mind the idea of PRSA granting individuals the APR credential. However, it would require continuing education and re-certification.
Posted @ Monday, July 16, 2012 5:34 AM by Douglas Burdett
Hey Everyone. This is a great debate.  
 
If we let majority rule, we should not waste our time with an oath. I'm fine with that. I didn't think as deeply as you guys have before using the word "oath". I agree that it is probably un-necessary and that we should just focus on taking "action that support our values". Actions certainly speak louder than words.  
 
That said, you guys do seem to like the idea of "establishing best practices" with the caveat that best practices are bound to change. I think that the inbound networking group for marketing agencies can help facilitate conversation around this. I'd also encourage you guys to collaborate elsewhere.  
 
Finally, I'm also hearing that *some of you* like the idea of better certifications. I agree that more should be done here. We've had quite a few false starts at HubSpot re: certification, but I think we'll get it right soon.  
 
Please continue the debate as you see fit.
Posted @ Monday, July 16, 2012 10:49 AM by Peter Caputa
Just wanted to let you know that I was watching.
Posted @ Tuesday, July 17, 2012 7:56 AM by The Strong Silent Type
Pete: 
 
Love this post! 
 
I'm not one to leave a lot of links on posts, but I too thought about an "Inbound Marketer's Creed," but with a military twist. 
 
<a>http://www.kunocreative.com/blog/bid/68489/The-Inbound-Marketer-s-Creed-Emulating-Military-Tradition<a> 
 
What do you think? 
 
Cheesy, I know :) 
 
@CPollittIU
Posted @ Wednesday, July 18, 2012 3:32 PM by Chad H. Pollitt
Pete, 
 
Definitely agree with the group towards avoiding the oath or just forwarding people to Chad's blog post :) The bigger picture of standards, best practices, and continuing/evolving agency certifications makes a lot of sense. Also good to see Rick is just keeping an eye on the string of comments!
Posted @ Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:56 PM by Steve James
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics